Monday, 28 September 2026

Assess study quality before submission

A consistent framework for reviewing the comprehensiveness, transparency, and evidence base of your study.

Quality framework

Three dimensions behind a stronger feasibility study

Review the study as one connected story: complete in scope, clear in method, and supported by credible evidence.

01

Comprehensiveness

Market, demand, competition, location, governance, academic model, quality, finance, and implementation.

02

Transparency

Documented, understandable methods and assumptions, with enough information to judge validity and reliability.

03

Evidence-based

Reliable, verifiable sources and findings and recommendations supported by evidence rather than assumption.

Scoring scale

Three clear levels for every criterion

The same scale is used for private university and college, foreign branch, new branch, and add-program frameworks.

  1. 00

    Not met

    Absent, insufficient information, or significant readiness gaps.

  2. 01

    Partial

    Addressed but needs more detail, evidence, or refinement.

  3. 02

    Met

    Comprehensively addressed with sufficient evidence of submission readiness.

Check your readiness

Start with a short checklist

Get a non-binding early signal on the completeness of the core elements.

An early guidance signal—not a formal CUA evaluation.
Start assessment